IRS Takes Aggressive Stance on LLC Self-Employment Tax Income

If you have an LLC do you know how much your member’s shares are when it comes to self-employment tax?


It’s a complicated matter because the IRS code and regulations do not provide any guidance on how to treat an LLC member in that regard. However, the agency has just provided a form that details how aggressive it will be in going after self-employment taxes from certain LLC members and it’s something to be aware of. Kevin Thompson, CPA says “this is another example of a complex set of laws biting taxpayers when they try and do the right thing.”


Before anything else, it’s important to understand why this is an issue, who is subject to SE tax, and why the authority doesn’t exist.


Self-employment income is taxed at 15.3%. 12.4% goes to old-age survivors and disability insurance tax. The remaining 2.9% is designated toward hospital insurance tax. Another 0.9% has been tacked on to a taxpayer’s self-employment if their income is over $250,000 married – filing jointly, and $200,000 if single. In total, the self-employment tax burden, under the current law, can be as high as 16.2%, before considering the deduction for one-half of the self-employment tax that doesn’t include the 0.9% surtax.

What exactly is self-employment income?

It is the gross income derived by an individual from any trade or business carried on by the individual less deductions allocated to the business.

How it affects partnerships

Partners can receive income in 3 ways.


For services to the partnership – Some partners in an LLC are paid wages and receive a W-2, like an employee. Even though this is popular it’s wrong because members who are partners are not employees of the partnership.


Instead, the proper way to compensate partners is to pay them a “guaranteed payment” which is subject to self-employment tax.


The third way is when any net income the partnership generates that is not paid out as guaranteed payments is later divided among the partners, with each including his or her allocable share of the partnership’s net income (or loss) in taxable income. This is whether or not the partnership actually distributes the income to the partner.  It’s known as the partner’s “distributive share.” Thompson says “I am a CPA, practicing near 40 years and my eyes rolled in my head like a slot machine when I read this. Why does this have to be so complicated?”


It gets tricky because the distributive share of partnership income of a “limited partner” – other than guaranteed payments – is not included in self-employment income.


In limited partnerships, there are two types of partners under the state law.


  • General partners
  • Limited partners


General partners are able to manage and control the business but have unlimited legal liability.


A creditor can only take a limited partner’s share of what they invested in the company and cannot pursue their personal assets.


A limited partner cannot take control of the partnership.


Congress has excluded the distributive share of limited partners from self-employment income. And because a limited partner can’t participate in the management of the partnership, their involvement is limited to their cash investment.  It would appear that the limited partner’s distributive share was the same as earnings on a passive investment. Because of this, the Congress has decided it shouldn’t be included in self-employment income. However, if a limited partner performed services for the partnership and was paid a guaranteed payment, that payment would be included in their self-employment income. Thompson says “Congress has already ruled on this so this is pretty well defined. But, I do believe if there is a way for the IRS to squeeze one more drop of blood from this they will try.”


Limited Liability Companies (LLC’s) are different than general or limited partnerships. In an LLC, ALL the members of the partnership have limited legal liability. But unlike limited partners, LLC members are able to participate in the management of the organization to some degree. This poses a problem for tax law.


The IRS proposed regulations to govern whether the distributive share of partnership income of members of an LLC should be included in self-employment income. The LLC partner would then be treated like a limited partner and the distributive share would not be self-employment income unless the member had personal liability for the debts of the LLC under law. The problem is, the regulations were never finalized. “And this, in theory,” says Thompson “is another example of the challenges facing both sides. We realize this is a problem; Congress starts to fix it but then special interests kill it.”


The Congress went ballistic about the idea of a “hidden tax increase” and squelched it. In theory, you can exclude the distributive income of an LLC member from SE income but that doesn’t mean the IRS will not argue that you should. Several arguments have ended up in the courts.


You can read examples of these arguments and other details here.

Self-employment tax for LLC’s in summary:

The IRS says that if an LLC member provides significant services to a service LLC, then the member is not a limited partner because the income of the LLC is attributable to the services rendered by its members. It has determined that even when the LLC is not a service partnership, but instead sells a product, it doesn’t matter. If the LLC member manages the LLC, all the income attributable to the member is subject to SE tax, even if a portion of that income could reasonably be argued to represent a return of the LLC member’s capital investment to the LLC.  If the LLC member is involved in the management of the LLC, the income needs to be subject to SE tax.


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102


IRS Penalties Go Up as 2017 Tax Rates Go Down

Bloomberg BNA has just published its 2017 Projected Tax Rates along with a projection of tax items that have been adjusted for inflation.


That means that the cost of noncompliance will increase. The good news is that individuals and businesses can look forward to lower tax liability because of higher deductions and credits. You can view the full report here.


Congress has passed legislation that may revoke the passports of taxpayers who currently have serious delinquencies in tax debt. This has caused a trend toward higher penalties. Congress has provided more predictability for business taxpayers by returning to annual increases for the business expensing limits.


The report includes projections for income tax brackets, personal exemption, standard deduction, and penalties that will give taxpayers and tax planners a reference to save more tax dollars in 2017. It also includes over 320 that are contained in more than 55 Internal Revenue code provisions. The official statement from the IRS will be published later this year. Amounts are based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation adjustments.


Kevin Thompson, CPA says “Watch out for more penalties.”


The IRS code will be imposing penalties for failure to file returns, failure to furnish information returns, and failure to pay tax. This will affect individuals, companies, trusts, and estates. Several of these penalties have been tied to annual inflation adjustments and some were increased. This raises the possibility that there will be even higher penalties for noncompliance coming in the future.


Tax preparers may also see their penalty costs soar. You can see a complete list in the full report.

How tax brackets are affected

Because the higher Consumer Price Index (CPI) is higher, it pushes the definition of brackets higher. It will also increase the standard deduction and exemption amounts.


Those who are in higher income brackets will have some relief in 2017 because the top 39.6 % bracket will begin at $470,700 for those who are married and filing jointly and $418,400 for single taxpayers.

Personal Exemptions and the Standard Deduction

Thompson says “Most taxpayers may claim a personal exemption for every member of their household. In 2017, this should remain unchanged.” The personal exemption for taxpayers with higher income has been phased out. Taxpayers may choose either the higher of their itemized deductions or take the standard deduction which varies according to filing status. Standard deduction amounts will be somewhat higher in 2017 than in 2016

Alt Minimum Tax (AMT)

Inflation adjustments will make the difference between having to pay AMT or not for some taxpayers.

Estate and Gift Tax Exclusions

Bloomberg is projecting that the estate tax basic exclusion for those who die in 2017 will be $5,49 million.  It was $5.45 million in 2016. The annual gift tax exclusion will remain the same ($14,000) in 2017. Thompson says “high net worth individuals should consider large gifts to family members. This large estate exclusion can disappear anytime.”


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102


Retirement May Not all it’s Cracked Up to Be

Retirement isn’t for everyone. It turns out many retirees aren’t satisfied with the way it’s been going for them. The Employee Benefit Research Institute did a study between 1998 and 2012. They interviewed the same 20,000 retirees every 2 years. Here is what they found:


Only 31.7% – 40.9% reported moderate satisfaction with retirement and just over 10% were completely unsatisfied. Very satisfied retirees dropped from 60.5% in 1998 to 48.6% in 2012, which is below half.


Kevin Thompson, CPA says “I think most people think retirement will be easy. I think most people forget just how much of their time was consumed by their careers and young families and neglect to plan for that time.”


Although the study didn’t research the reasons for the rise in dissatisfaction, other studies say that financial difficulties are the cause. For one thing, retirement income from traditional pension accounts has fallen from 38% in 1980 to 20% in 2008.


Other reasons that retirees have become dissatisfied is that they had raised expectations about what it would be like. Some are searching for new ways of creating a retirement income that would give them flexibility. Baby Boomers are clearly not as happy with retirement as generations who came before them.


If you are retired or approaching retirement here are tips to make your experience more satisfying:


  1. Interact and socialize with others. – Keep up relationships with old friends and don’t be afraid to make new ones. Make most of your social interactions in person rather than by telephone or email. Personal contact is more beneficial, emotionally.
  2. Do things you love – Stay busy. You may want to find a new career or pursue a hobby. When you follow your passions it adds years to your life. Think about what you enjoyed doing when you were young. Reconnect with those joys and put them back in your life.
  3. Use your time wisely – Fewer than 3 in 10 people plan their personal activities, recreation time and travel once they’ve retired. A lack of structure may make you feel like you don’t have control over your life. You may feel less motivated to try new things and that can lead to depression or loss of self-esteem. Instead, detail your goals and create an action plan to achieve them. A happy retirement depends on meeting your expectations.


Thompson closes with this advice: “Our busy lives in pre-retirement become empty post-retirement. Successful retirement will take planning. Not just financial but more importantly planning to LIVE in retirement and not just make sure you have enough money.”


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102


Get Transcript Data Breach Still Affecting Taxpayers

The IRS’s online Get Transcript app (GTA) ( experienced a data breach during tax season that is still affecting taxpayers, according to a report released by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). The report was released a day after the IRS relaunched the app with fixes to prevent identity theft.


Kevin Thompson, CPA says “TIGTA was established in January 1999 in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98) to provide independent oversight of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) activities. As mandated by RRA 98, TIGTA assumed most of the responsibilities of the IRS’ former Inspection Service.” For more information on this function, click here


The GTA was taken down in May 2015 after the agency discovered that thousands of taxpayers’ transcripts had been accessed by thieves. It turns out that 390,000 taxpayers were affected and 295,000 more had their transcripts targeted but not stolen. In an effort to help victims, the IRS provided taxpayers with Identity Protection PINS as well as free credit monitoring.


Unfortunately, the IRS was not able to identify 620,931 individuals whose information was compromised. It was also discovered that unauthorized users successfully obtained access to 355,262 taxpayer’s accounts.


Another 2,470 taxpayers whose accounts were breached through the GTA were not identified because the IRS excluded three system error codes that could have identified them. The IRS also didn’t place identity theft incident markers on the accounts of 3206 taxpayers who had been identified as victims of the breach. They have informed the TIGTA that each would receive an identity theft marker. The IRS also did not offer PINS or free credit monitoring to 79,122 taxpayers whose accounts may have been targeted. Thompson says “as a businessman and CPA, I am aware that these breaches happen. The host of the data breached should do everything in its power to restore those violated. It troubles me that the IRS did not do that in this circumstance.”


The TIGTA is recommending that the IRS execute other methods of evaluation that will identify individuals who have been affected by the breach as well as issue notifications to the taxpayers who may have been targeted and place identity theft markers on their accounts. They must also analyze system error codes, place identity theft markers, and issue PINS to those whose personal data was used by the hackers of the Get Transcript app.


The IRS has agreed to comply with 7 of 8 recommendations from the TIGTA.  They do not want to issue PINS to 79,122 taxpayers whose accounts thieves attempted to hack but didn’t access. The TIGTA is concerned that the IRS’s failure to provide prompt action will leave taxpayers at the risk of further fraud.


The IRS says that most of the information used by the hackers originated outside of the agency. However, Debra Holland, commissioner of the IRS’s Wage and Investment Divisions says, “The theft of taxpayer data from the Get Transcript system was unprecedented in both its scope and the method in which the crime was committed.” Thompson says “and with that, the IRS must take measures to prevent further hacks.”


When the GTA relaunches, its new multi-factor authentication will require users to enter codes, sent to their email or mobile phone to protect their identity. Multi-factor authentication is an upgrade that will provide better security even though it will mean taxpayers will have to take extra steps in the process.


The IRS thanked the TIGTA for their help in finding better ways to serve the taxpayers who were victims. They have announced a new secure access framework for the Get Transcript app that will significantly increase protection against criminals who impersonate taxpayers and aid them in other services in the future.


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102

Should the IRS Have the Power to Regulate Tax Preparers?

The Senate Finance Committee has been trying to decide whether or not to give the IRS the authority to regulate tax preparers.  Senator Elizabeth Warren and others have proposed that the IRS be required to fill out simple tax returns. That would deal the “Free File Alliance,” led by companies like Intuit, H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt a major blow. The decision has deadlocked Congress and Warren’s bill is stalled. Kevin Thompson, CPA states “I like the idea that the IRS fill out the simple tax returns. They have all of the data for these returns. They can prepare and send a copy to a taxpayer with a “if you disagree …” letter and we can be done with that return and the millions like it.”


The question is; are continuing education and tests for tax preparers the answer or would another solution be more effective?


The IRS has tried in the past to impose regulation on preparers without success. Wouldn’t it be a better solution to get rid of bad preparers who may cause financial disaster for their clients? Thompson says “again, I like the idea of getting rid of the bad preparers. What I don’t like is that the people making and enforcing the rules get to decide who is bad. Seems like a conflict of interest to me.”


The way it works now, the IRS can’t regulate tax preparers before they start preparing returns. The majority of states allow anyone to become a return preparer without a test, with minimal education, and without a background check. The IRS and Department of Justice can take bad preparers to court, but only one at a time. If several all work in the same practice, they can still continue to do bad work even if a partner is ordered by the court to stop. Injunctions take time and much effort to shut down bad companies. Often it takes years.


It’s like trying to pull up weeds individually rather than killing them all with Roundup. Also, if you don’t get the roots, they pop up again. Thompson adds “maybe tax preparation needs Peer Review. Maybe the IRS together with the AICPA and the NAEA can create a program to monitor this.”


It’s not that it’s a bad thing to try to get rid of bad tax preparers one at a time. It’s the system that is the problem. Bad preparers should be cut off while good preparers should be able to continue doing what they’re doing. A good preparer doesn’t need to go to mandatory training because they naturally keep up with updates in the tax laws to run their businesses successfully. They need support instead.


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102.



Do it Yourself Tax Software Can Be Messy

Many taxpayers use “do it yourself” tax software to file their income tax returns. However, a fair amount makes a mess of it and pay the price when they make mistakes. It’s not unusual for tax preparers to receive calls from clients asking them to fix their messed up self-filed returns. What’s ironic is that the IRS is increasingly regulating paid tax preparers but not the providers of tax preparation software.


E-file providers top priority is the security of taxpayer’s accounts. Publication 4557, Safeguarding Taxpayer Data as well as Publication 4600 Safeguarding Taxpayer information provide best practices and guidance. Last year, Intuit, the makers of Turbo Tax, found incidences of stolen identity fraud when personal information was taken and used to file fraudulent claims.


Victims of the fraud had to manually file their tax returns as well as file police reports to prove their identities had been stolen. They also had to keep an eye on their credit reports to make sure their information was not being used fraudulently in other ways. Even still, Intuit was not subject to penalties and only had to make changes so it wouldn’t happen again the next year.


One of the main problems with using do it yourself tax software is that the majority of consumers have little knowledge about changing tax laws or how the software can work to their best advantage as individuals. They rely on automated prompts as guides, mistakenly thinking the process is simple. Kevin Thompson, CPA says “I remember an old line about automation … Garbage in, Garbage out. I don’t know the statistics of DIY but almost every time I have reviewed a self-prepared tax return, it was wrong.”


Costly mistakes happen even in the simplest returns. When something as insignificant as a city tax is missed using the software, it can cost taxpayer thousands of dollars. In the case of audits or other proceedings, the taxpayer bears the burden of explaining why he or she took certain deductions or made errors that could have been avoided if they had hired a tax preparer. Thompson says, “I have yet to see a scenario where I was unable to save the taxpayer a significant amount of additional taxes compared to the self-prepared return.”


Small business owners who know little about Schedule K-1s, misclassify expenses or do not send out required 1099’s. They don’t realize that the IRS matches third party filings with an individual return and may incur penalties as a result.


When business owners use do it yourself tax software and payroll programs, they may assume their company filed partnership and other forms correctly, when in reality, they did not. They may also not be consistent with filing and meeting deadlines.


A taxpayer needs to be aware that do it yourself tax software providers do not have to meet the same high standards that tax professionals do. It’s always better to hire professional help to avoid making costly mistakes. A tax professional’s fee will be significantly less than paying steep penalties incurred from mistakes. Overlooking even the smallest item may make the difference in the size of a taxpayer’s refund check.


The best way to avoid audits and keep money in your pocket is to let a professional preparer do the work for you. Thompson says “another old adage, you get what you pay for.”


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102.


Expect More Tax Audits as the IRS Hires More Enforcement Workers

Do you think the IRS has been lax on enforcing tax audits lately? Well, think again.  They are in the process of hiring 700 new employees, which means there’s more of a chance you will find an audit letter in your mailbox. Kevin E. Thompson, CPA adds “it has been years since we have seen the IRS add bodies solely to undertake examinations. If taxpayers have been aggressive, they could get caught up in this catch-up move.”


The agency has had a 24% drop in employees since 2010 with tax audits at an 11 year low. IRS commissioner John Koskinen stated that the IRS is losing $4 -$5 Billion a year because they haven’t had enough employees to enforce collections.  Matthew Cooling, EA says “the last five years have seen the taxing authorities rely on electronic information for examination and closing the tax gap. Risks of examination include examining all open years and sharing the results with the various states.” Cooling says “once the federal examination is complete, they pass the results to your state and the state has the right to bill you for their share of the audit results.”


Despite the fact that the IRS and the Obama Administration have been asking Congress for more funds to hire more employees, they have had little success. Instead, the funds are coming from retirements, other employees leaving and by refiguring their budget. New hires will focus on small businesses and those who are self-employed. Thompson says “it’s risky for the economy to examine small businesses. They do not have the resources to afford representation nor the additional taxes that may be due.”

Even after this year, the IRS will still be down 2,000 workers as compared to the beginning of the year.


Original Article

Avoid tax audits

Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102.

Worst Ideas about Paying Taxes

Kevin Thompson, CPA, did a recent internet search revealing some horrifically interesting ideas about paying taxes. Below are just a few of some of the worst ideas that people have come up with regarding doing their taxes.


Thinking that filing taxes is unconstitutional by citing the 16th amendment. The whole idea of being “free men” and the unconstitutionality of taxes has been played out for decades. Ask Wesley Snipes how that worked for him. Folks, this has been acted upon by every court in every state and nary has a one expressed any interest in the idea. If this is your position, let it go as it will not work.


Telling people they didn’t pay taxes because they received a refund. (It actually means they had too much deducted out of their paycheck.) “In my practice” says Kevin Thompson, CPA, “with our average taxpayers, we try and get clients in the $1,000 range of either owing or receiving refunds.” Thompson goes onto say, “this philosophy has changed for the higher net worth clients. With interest rates at all-time lows, it is often more strategic to overestimate taxes and eliminate the exposure to expensive, nondeductible penalties.” California no longer offers a safe harbor provision for taxpayers with more than $1,000,000 in taxable income. “That means that these taxpayers have to project income on a quarterly basis and pay in their estimated taxes. With the volatility in stock markets, annual bonuses for executives and higher profits in S Corporations and LLC’s, it is not uncommon for a California taxpayer to find himself in a penalty position due to a large transaction in December.”


Not counting “cash” as income. “Yeah, right” says Thompson. The IRS estimates they lose $15 Billion in revenues annually due to the improper accounting and reporting for cash transactions. In the UK they believe they lose $8 Billion pounds annually and call cash payments “morally reprehensible.”  “Last time I checked” says Thompson, “the USD states that it is legal tender for all debts.” I just know that the US Treasury Department together with the Worlds taxing authorities continue to crack down on cash. So, if you are living in the world of cash and not reporting it, you should be prepared for a bad ending.


Deciding that they don’t have to pay taxes because they are over 70 years of age. There is no magic number. Some have to pay taxes after death. “Although there are many advantages to aging in this country, an abatement of taxes for the elderly is not one of them” says Thompson.


Not paying taxes because they’re on Social Security. That is only true if they have no other source of income. If SS is your only source of income, you do not have to pay taxes. But if you have other sources of income like interest, dividends and capital gains, with the provisional tax calculation, some or up to 85% of your SS income can be taxable.


Citing a pet as a dependent. “Man, if my wife is reading this she’ll think of new things for the Bully Violent” says Thompson. There is never a scenario where pets can be claimed as dependents.


Under the impression that their tax preparer works for the government or on the government’s behalf. In fact, a tax preparer can be their best advocate in tax matters with the IRS. “This can be both true and false” says Thompson. “If a client is being investigated for evasion, conversations with tax preparers are not protected and subject to discovery.”


Making the mistake of not filing W2 or 1099 income if they didn’t receive a form in the mail. That income has to be included. The IRS has an electronic matching initiative most commonly referred to as CP 2000. Thompson says “80% of the letters received by this office from the IRS are a result of that initiative. The IRS has the information and the technology to match to your returns so you’d better report it or be prepared for an examination resulting in interest and penalties too.”


They believe they don’t have to pay their tax professional a fee if they don’t receive a refund. Thompson says “do I get a bonus if I get a larger refund?”


Can you think of any more dumb ideas?


Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102.

The Entrepreneurial Spirit from Beyonce to Bill Gates

It’s not easy being an entrepreneur.  It takes a ton of hard work and a bucket full of tears if you want to be successful. Kevin Thompson, CPA says “being an entrepreneur is about the hardest thing I have ever done. As the entrepreneur, I am responsible for customers, vendors and, most importantly, employees.”  Below are observations from 23 well known personalities about the entrepreneurial spirit.

  1. Beyonce

Beyonce finds that the pressure to keep up a hectic schedule and to stay on top is unbearable at times but she loves what she does. She doesn’t think about it and, instead, stays happy by doing her own thing. Thompson says “how many readers see her as an entrepreneur?” Responsibilities for her brand and the various outlets including fashion, cosmetics and, of course, entertainment, keep her very busy.

  1. Mark Zuckerberg

When he first started building Facebook he wasn’t thinking so much about building a company because he didn’t know how to go about it. What he believes made him successful is enlisting the help of other people who knew how to get it done.

  1. Larry Page

Larry, who is a co-founder at Google realizes that everyone has strengths and weaknesses and that you acquire knowledge over time. After a while you pick up things. He believes you have to have a vision for the future and understand the industry you’re in. Starting a company takes hard work, sometimes 24 hours a day. What you lack in skills can be made up in other areas.

  1. Sergey Brin

Sergey is Google’s other co-founder. His take on success is all about serving people. Google serves millions. Google has gone from about 10,000 searches per day to 50 million.  The scale at which the company has grown is where the challenge lies.

  1. Lori Griener

Lori is a “Shark Tank” investor. She finds the biggest challenge is dealing with people who are unethical. She believes that “karma is a bitch.” What goes around, comes around.

  1. Bill Gates

As founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates nurtures the idea of being innovative. He feels that small companies attempting to launch don’t take advantage of this concept. Technology is the strategic weapon of large companies but it can overwhelm the smaller ones causing them to not take advantage of its power.

  1. Travis Kalanick

Travis founder of Uber feels that entrepreneurs must be careful not to let their passion overtake them and compares it to going down the rabbit hole. You have to keep your passion in check.

  1. K. Rowling

The author of Harry Potter remarked that we talk too much about success and not enough about failure.  Most entrepreneurs fail over and over before they succeed. It’s the ability to resist failure or use it as an opportunity to achieve success that’s important. Thompson says “my now departed friend and business confidants, Dave Williams, used the phrase failing forward. I don’t know too many, if any, successful entrepreneurs who have not failed at least once before enjoying success.”

  1. Dr.Dre

Building the right team is crucial to make it to the top. Make sure all the people around you have the same vision and motivation. It takes time to build the perfect team. Once you do that, stick with them.

  1. Mark Cuban

Don’t take “no” for an answer. “Every no takes you to a yes.” It’s all about the numbers.

  1. Jack Dorsey

The founder of Twitter didn’t know what he was doing when he started. His biggest challenge was bookkeeping. He learned from his mistakes and from listening to his customer’s suggestions. His best-selling items came from employees and customers.

  1. Tory Birch

Tory became successful helping women feel and look glamorous but her biggest challenge was her self-esteem. In an article she wrote, a friend mentioned that she had shied away from the word “ambition.” Tory realized that she was right. Thompson says “I quote Sara Bareilles and tell people who are interested in being entrepreneurs that I want to see you be brave.”

  1. Barbara Corcoran

Shark Tank investor Barbara Corcoran says that an entrepreneur’s biggest enemy is fear and noted that after 10 years of experience under your belt, you start to realize how many near death experiences you actually lived through. It only gets scarier because you know what you have to lose. This makes you less open to the universe where you are willing to try a dozen things at once. Thompson says “as entrepreneurialism becomes more and more a part of your existence, you have to learn to manage quicker.”

  1. Charles Schwab

Even though he’s in his 70’s Charles Schwab isn’t slowing down. He is a proponent of innovation like Bill Gates. “It’s the engine that drives our future.” “Those who do not innovate go out of business fast. You have to stay nimble and inventive if you want to survive.” “When I am looking for innovation,” says Thompson, “I just watch young people. They are always innovative in their lives. They accept change easily and adapt to technology quickly. It is free and exciting research and, when you engage them, it can really be a lot of fun.”

  1. Oprah Winfrey

Lady O says the hardest time in her life was starting her own network OWN because she knew people were waiting for her to fail. They were lying in wait for her to make a mistake.  You either have to close down or make cutbacks to move forward.

  1. Michelle Phan

Michelle is a YouTube star and was basically an overnight success. It was overwhelming for her. She went from a shy loner to having 10,000 friends overnight and felt an incredible connection with them. Now she has over 7.5 million subscribers and makes friends easily.

  1. Diane von Furstenberg

Every day is a challenge and you have to embrace it. She learned early in her life to roll with the punches and deal with unpleasantness.

  1. Kevin O’ Leary

Shark Tank investor, Kevin O’Leary believes that in order to be a venture capitalist, you need to have started a business first. It’s important to experience the terror of getting started so you avoid making mistakes.

  1. George Foreman

Heavy weight boxing champ George Foreman says that you have to understand that you start at the bottom and work your way to the top in any business you choose to pursue. Most people are afraid of that, particularly celebrities and others who are well known. They hate to think about starting at the bottom again because they know they have a long way to go. When you start at the bottom, you can only go up.

  1. Wolfgang Puck

If you want to be a good chef, you have to multi-task. That means being a manager, businessman and a great cook. This can sometimes be difficult.

  1. Larry Ellison

CEO of Oracle finds the hardest part of being an entrepreneur is having to let people go who have helped build his business because of management problems. He felt loyal but realized that he had outgrown his original team and had to make changes in order to move forward.

  1. Robert Herjavec

Shark Tank Investor Robert Herjavec believes in the power of teamwork and leadership. You have to be able to inspire the people around you. If not, go sell real estate. People don’t want to be managed. They want to be led. “And,” adds Thompson, “they definitely do not want to be entrepreneurs.” Thompson CPA used to present seminars around the topics of How to start and Run successful small businesses. Thompson said “one particular seminar weekend offering in Los Angeles, we had over 1,000 people sign up. One hour in, hundreds of them headed for the door because “they wanted a job and not to be entrepreneurs.”

  1. Arianna Huffington

Arianna realizes that there must be work-life balance. It can’t be all about money and power. Success may work in the short term but after a while you will topple over. Instead the measure of success includes well-being, wisdom, wonder and giving.

Original Article


Contact Kevin Thompson CPA  or call him @ (310) 450-4625 x102.

Is the Big Bang Coming?

Big Bang or Colossal Crash? It may be happening sooner than we think. The Physical Review letters published a paper in which a group of physicists developed a mechanism for “cosmological collapse.” They are saying the universe will stop expanding and collapse back into itself. Needless to say, we would all be annihilated.


We’ve heard people spouting “last days” forever but the numbers and models in the paper are suggesting that a collapse will happen sooner than later.


Antonio Padilla, from the University of Nottingham, one of the authors of the paper, says, “The fact that we are seeing dark energy now could be taken as an indication of impending doom, and we are trying to look at the data to put some figures on the end date. Early indications suggest the collapse will kick in in a few tens of billions of years but we have yet to properly verify this.” “Personally, this puts tax season in perspective for me” says Kevin Thompson, CPA. “I won’t really kill myself to get all of this stuff done now since I know the end is near. I mean it can wait, right?”


A Few tens of billions of years is not a cause for immediate alarm but the team of scientists feel they have found the cause of Earth’s impending doom.  Thompson goes on to say “since most of us don’t make it out alive anyway, I think we can stop worrying about this for this generation and a few to come. But, any of you who wish to continue to worry, please feel free.”

Original Article


Watch this video to hear the news story. (Video)